In recent discussions surrounding the U.S. presidency, concerns have emerged about the true power dynamics at play within the executive branch. With a series of executive orders signed and escalating tensions with Russia, many are questioning whether President Biden is truly in control or if a deeper agenda is at work.
Key Takeaways
- The legitimacy of President Biden’s control over the executive branch is under scrutiny.
- Historical parallels drawn with past presidents who were incapacitated.
- The influence of the so-called “Deep State” and external actors on U.S. policy.
- Escalating tensions with Russia and implications for global security.
The Question of Control
The current state of the U.S. presidency raises significant questions about who is really in charge. Colonel Douglas McGregor argues that President Biden may not be fully in control of his faculties, drawing parallels to historical figures like Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt, who were similarly incapacitated during their presidencies.
- Historical Precedents:
- Woodrow Wilson: Suffered a stroke, with his wife effectively running the government.
- Franklin D. Roosevelt: Elected while gravely ill, leading to significant policy decisions made by others.
McGregor suggests that Biden’s recent actions, including signing numerous executive orders, indicate he may be a puppet for a larger agenda orchestrated by powerful figures within Washington.
The Role of the Deep State
The term “Deep State” refers to a network of influential members within the government and military who operate independently of elected officials. McGregor points to individuals like Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken as key players in this network, suggesting they may be pushing a Marxist agenda that undermines traditional American values.
- Key Figures:
- Jake Sullivan: Alleged architect of current policies.
- Tony Blinken: Secretary of State, involved in shaping foreign policy.
This network, according to McGregor, is using executive orders to bypass Congress and implement policies that many Americans would not support if they were fully aware of the implications.
Escalation with Russia
Recent events have heightened concerns about U.S. involvement in a potential conflict with Russia. McGregor highlights a significant escalation over the weekend, where drones reportedly launched attacks from NATO territory, crossing previously established red lines set by President Biden himself.
- Recent Developments:
- Drones destroyed a Russian bomber, allegedly launched from Finnish soil.
- This action could be interpreted as a direct act of war against Russia, raising the stakes significantly.
McGregor emphasizes that such military actions typically require the president’s approval, raising further questions about Biden’s awareness and control over military operations.
The Implications of Inaction
As tensions rise, the lack of clear communication from the White House regarding these military actions is alarming. McGregor argues that the American public deserves to know whether their government is leading them toward a hot war with Russia.
- Public Sentiment:
- Many Americans are unaware of the potential consequences of escalating military actions.
- The absence of public debate on these issues is concerning, especially as Congress appears to be disengaged.
Conclusion
The current state of the U.S. presidency is marked by uncertainty and concern over who is truly in charge. With historical precedents of incapacitated leaders and the influence of a powerful Deep State, the implications for American democracy and global security are profound. As tensions with Russia escalate, it is crucial for the American public to engage in discussions about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and the true nature of executive power.
In a time of such uncertainty, the question remains: Who is really running the show in Washington?
