BLM: Harris a “dictatorship” candidate

Politics

BLM: Harris a “dictatorship” candidate

In a surprising turn of events, Black Lives Matter (BLM) publicly denounced Kamala Harris’s nomination as the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) presidential candidate. This statement, released on July 23, 2024,…

March 10, 2025 • 3 min read • Art Grindstone

Art Grindstone is the hard-nosed storyteller behind Unexplained.co, a veteran investigator whose life’s work sits at the crossroads of the paranormal, fringe science, and the shadows most people try not to look into. With decades spent chasing impossible stories — black-budget psychic programs, vanished Cold War experiments, desert rituals that sparked UFO waves, and the strange phenomena buried in America’s forgotten backroads — Art brings a rare combination of skepticism, awe, and journalistic precision. He’s not here to debunk. He’s not here to blindly believe. He follows the evidence wherever it leads — even when it leads someplace deeply uncomfortable. Known for his immersive, cinematic style and his ability to turn obscure research into gripping narrative, Art has built a devoted following across podcasts, long-form features, documentaries, and serialized investigations. His interviews are direct. His analysis is unflinching. His voice has become a staple in the modern paranormal renaissance — the guy people turn to when a story is too strange, too complex, or too dangerous for anyone else to touch. Off-mic, Art works with a distributed network of researchers, archivists, and field operatives who help surface the stories mainstream media ignores. On-mic, he transforms their findings into meticulous, high-impact reporting that refuses to insult the intelligence of true believers. His philosophy is simple: Take the phenomenon seriously. Treat the audience with respect. Tell the story as if the world depends on it — because sometimes it does. When Art Grindstone digs into a case, he isn’t just chasing a mystery. He’s tracing the fault lines of reality itself.

In This Report(7)

In a surprising turn of events, Black Lives Matter (BLM) publicly denounced Kamala Harris’s nomination as the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) presidential candidate. This statement, released on July 23, 2024, raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about the democratic process within the party. Why did this significant news go largely unnoticed until now?

Key Takeaways

BLM criticized the undemocratic process behind Harris’s nomination.
The media largely ignored BLM’s statement, raising questions about coverage priorities.
The call for a snap primary reflects deeper concerns about representation and voter choice.

BLM’s Stance on Kamala Harris

Black Lives Matter’s statement was clear: they do not endorse Kamala Harris. They described the process that led to her nomination as reminiscent of a dictatorship, emphasizing that it lacked democratic principles. BLM argued that the DNC’s actions were orchestrated by elites, sidelining the voices of the voters.

The organization pointed out that Joe Biden was pressured to step aside, and the selection of Harris was made without a proper primary vote. This situation, they argued, undermines the very essence of democracy.

Advertisement

The Media’s Silence

What’s particularly striking is the media’s response—or lack thereof. Despite the significance of BLM’s statement, major news outlets like CNN and MSNBC seemed to overlook it. Only a few platforms, such as Fox News and Reuters, covered the story. This raises questions about the media’s role in shaping public discourse and their responsibility to report on critical issues.

The Call for a Snap Primary

BLM’s statement included a demand for a snap primary. They argued that the current political landscape does not reflect the will of the voters. The organization highlighted that many black voters felt their voices were ignored in the nomination process. They insisted that the DNC must respect democratic values and allow voters to have a say in their candidates.

Advertisement

Historical Context

While Harris is often touted as a historic candidate, BLM reminded the public that she is not the first black woman to run for president. Previous candidates have existed since the 1970s, but they were often overlooked in the primaries. This context adds depth to BLM’s criticism, suggesting that the narrative surrounding Harris’s candidacy may be more about optics than genuine representation.